Some portraitish stuff I’ve been drawin’ lately
[ 2 Comments ]
April 4th, 2010
It’s kind of hard to talk about sexuality when it’s so anchored in gender. Both the gender of the person holding the attraction, and the gender of the person they’re attracted to becomes integral. If either of those categories become unfixed or destabilised, or are, indeed, fixed in ambiguity it becomes all kinds of complicated. So, for example, if Joe identifies as a trans/genderqueer person, and I, as a transman, how do we describe our sexuality? And is it even necessary to?
Search for comics!
Tags
Anxiety
Artist
being
bodies
books
boyness
Capitalism
cute red scarves
Diatribe
Dreams
dressing up
fabulous
family
film
friends
Hair
Hello I'm Trans
It's weird that I've gone back to having a mohawk again in this comic
I wish I actually had a shirt like this
Joe
letting go
Love
multiplicity
Music
Oh look this is awesome!
Oh look this sucks!
Passing
politics
Pride
queer
reflection
representations
Rooster
Sadness
sexuality
Super Butts
Super gay
Telling people
Testosterone Deficient
thankyou
trans
trans comic
TV
Where we live
Wolverine
Archives
©2010-2013 Samuel Orchard | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑
I tooootally feel you on this topic. And I’ll leave it at that.
yay. definitely yay.
what about trans love?
Of course, yes, translove, and bearlove, and bicuriouslove, and, and, and….!
thats more like it:)
How about transensual….sounds a bit sexier than translove don’t you think???
oooooh that’s WAY better!
I totaly know what oy mean, At this point, the only think I am *quite* sure that I am *not* is a lesbian. Girl on girl does nothing for me… I mean, it;s adorable, but hot? Eh.
However, I do differentiate between fag-love and manchrushes~
Yes, differentiating between faglove and mancrushes makes total sense, see there’s even a whole range and continuum of desire in the midst of the continuums of sexuality as well. Oh so complicated.